Denying Youth

Categories: The Austere Publisher
Tags: No Tags
Published on: July 15, 2010

Fighting for the rights of the young and vulnerable is a cause that is easy to get behind. So it was no surprise when the galactic leaders of the Elite General Assembly responded to the recent the Rights of the Helpless Act.
This act would provide a list of basic rights for all young people throughout the galaxy. The protection this act would provide is important since the young have become increasingly vulnerable to recruitment into Dumizi armies and Human Parceling.
Almost every major system in the galaxy has ratified this new, dynamic act. But the Kroy has not. And it has become one of only two territories in the galaxy to reject an act that seems the very definition of universal liberty.
The Kroy were not always this opposed: when the Helpless Ones Act was first proposed in the Assembly, the Kroy helped to develop it and contributed most of act’s core ideas. And interest in the bill did not wane from Kroy after the act was drafted. Three of the last four Kroy moguls have tried to either contribute or ratify the act within their territories.
Yet even in the middle of a media skirmish over Kroy-funded Dumizis – a time when the Kroy could show some legislative support for young people – the Kroy will not radify the act that it helped to create.
The bill itself is nothing that should be causing this level of concern. It states that all children should be treated as human beings – regardless of race, class, gender, or disability. It states that parents should be allowed to live with their children, except in circumstances of abuse, and allows separated family members to reunite. And it states that no government should be allowed to take away a child’s basic right of a name, an identity and a right to express what they believe in.
So why is there opposition to this type of legislation?
Most Kroy critics are like Dolan Smave, who states that "Unlike some territories, the Kroy High Court has provided parents the parental rights and religious freedoms needed to control a child’s education." The implication being that the Kroy are in a position to police certain sections of the galaxy because of some intangible sense of moral superiority.
This superior attitude is driven home when opposition of the bill talks about the Kroy constitution and the Kroy Bill of Rights. Kroy critics believe that these two crucial documents of Kroy law already protect children, and that ratifying the Elite’s guidelines would be bowing to an outside power.
They also believe that to do so would compromise their position in current and future political power struggles – as Kroy would have bowed to an outside authority to create their legislation.
And there are other Kroy critics who are concerned about the impact of on-the-ground rights. There are those who believe this bill would somehow affect the rights of parents to have control over their own children. Others fear putting something as important as a child’s welfare into an ‘Elitist’ organization like the Elite. But such critics ignore the fact that the very wording of the act disproves these fears. And that the act places a high importance on creating healthy environments for children that are close to their families.
Baronet Ebaj has said that not ratifying such an important piece of Elite law was ’embarrassing’ and he was looking into why it had not yet been ratified. But Kroy critics seem to believe that ‘enforced’ guarantees for a child’s safety are meant more for under developed nations, and not galactic leaders like themselves. But by refusing to sign the act, Kroy has understated it’s importance in the galaxy. Even those who have signed the act into law may be less likely to follow it without Kroy promising to back and enforce the new legislation.

Welcome , Galactic Date: Thursday, February 27, 2020